Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Tupelo Council opts not to pursue plans for buses
by Emily Le Coz/NEMS Daily Journal
21 months ago | 770 views | 12 12 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TUPELO - The city won't pursue recommendations for a public bus system as outlined in a $25,000 study and instead will urge an appointed committee to seek other options.

Members of the City Council met Wednesday to discuss the transit study, among other issues, during an afternoon work session.

Although most said a need for subsidized transportation exists, few felt the study provided the right solutions at the right price, according to several members who were present.

The media was not there, nor were members of the Public Transportation Committee, which had launched the study.

"We want to look for something that will work, but we can't see that what was presented was workable for a variety of reasons," said Ward 5 Councilman Jonny Davis.

Davis referred to the proposed bus system that would run several buses along four routes through the city. It'd cost Tupelo taxpayers an estimated $436,050 annually and provide 62,200 rides its first year.

Not included in that projection were startup costs, actual routes or bus stops.

If the city wants to provide subsidized transit, Davis said, it ought to start with services for the elderly and handicapped.

But Public Transportation Committee Chairman Brad Prewitt said his group had proposed an inexpensive system to serve that population late last year: Northeast Mississippi Community Services would have run a two-bus system in Tupelo for $68,000 annually.

The council had rejected that plan in favor of the comprehensive study, the results of which now appear destined for a shelf.

Council President Fred Pitts said his group will not accept or use the study. He plans to send a letter to the Public Transportation Committee asking its members to explore other options.

But not all council members agree. Nettie Davis of Ward 4 said she strongly supports the study recommendations and thinks the city should move ahead.

"It seems to me it's something that's been pushed back because it's basically the needy - black, white or Hispanic - and the disabled," Davis said. "There doesn't seem to be a deep concern about these people."

Prewitt also expressed disappointment. He said he didn't know about this week's meeting and that, if he had, he would have urged the council to at least seek competitive bids.

"The council should allow the logical conclusion of our ... study, and that is to allow actual pricing to be obtained from vendors and for potential contributions to be accounted for, thereby giving the city an actual price where true budget consideration can occur," Prewitt said. "I would hope the council will allow the committee to finish what was started."

Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
gardenhead
|
August 20, 2010
Good to see that clearer minds are leading the council on this issue. Look for ways to help the citizens who have a legitimate need, and let the lazy good-for-nothings continue to lie in the beds they've made for themselves.

It's time to stop catering to people who want nothing but a handout.

And Nettie, retire that race card. It's about to disintegrate from overuse.

straightsense
|
August 20, 2010
25 g's wasted as usual. Stay tuned. They will probably spend more on the next study.

I'll have to agree in theory with another poster. Give the government something and they will screw it up, make it cost more and then claim a wonderful result.

I'll bet Dude Taxi driver involved in mental bomb case ride will do taxi rides for these folks. He would have lots of suspicious packages to report.

i'mbroke
|
August 20, 2010
The council spent $25,000 on a study that did not include the projections on startup costs, actual routes, and bus stops?

Who are these people who do half-ash studies?
Pragmatic
|
August 20, 2010
@beaver, the last thing this country/state/municipality needs is another entitlement program. Years ago my grandmother would call the local grocery and tell them what she needed and they would deliver the goods to her and she would pay for the groceries and a $5 delivery fee. Granted that was in the seventies and in another state, but the concept is the same. If there is a "TRUE" need, then capitalism will fill it. If there is a "PERCEIVED" need then government will fill it. But a quick case study will show that government has never filled a perceived need that did not end up being a money pit.
Pragmatic
|
August 20, 2010
I may be way off or at work during the time it happens, but could Nettie or someone else please tell me when all of these elderly and handicapped individuals are walking through town? I mean in the years I have lived here I have yet to see major scores of people "walking" in Tupelo. I mean they walk during the Elvis Festival and the Chili cookoff. But I have yet to see a major throng of people walking with groceries in their hands. I have also yet to read anything about the elderly, handicapped or invalid dying from starvation because they could not get to the grocery store. So how do they get their now? If it isn't broken don't try to fix it. The city wasted $25k, but the worst part is that they wasted the one commodity you can never get back, which is time.
thebeaver32
|
August 20, 2010
That's actually a good idea. They could come up with a voucher system of some sort. People who qualify for free or subsidized transportation could carry a card showing the taxi driver they are entitled to a ride. The taxi companies could bill the city on a monthly basis.

Some people might qualify for UNLIMITED rides. Others could get reduced fares, and/or limited numbers of rides. Maybe free rides to the hospital in all cases? There's lots of possibilities, and all for a LOT less than $500,000 a year.
WTFDude
|
August 20, 2010
tupelojoe81: You're right.

Actually the city could just pay regular cab fare rated for the elderly and handicapped and still spend FAR LESS than they were going to spend on a bus system.

So, the "system" is already in place, it's called a "taxi".
tupelojoe81
|
August 20, 2010
now the CDF should go out and find a business that will actually run buses. City buses were never the answer to begin with. We used to have that handicapped bus service that was located on CLiff Gookin, why not find someone like that again? Go recruit someone.
sktdctr
|
August 20, 2010
Nettie- if you are so concerned about these people, maybe you should take your time and money and go around and transport them yourself. I for one am not going to pay more for other peoples laziness and lack of pride (one's who would rather live off the government than to provide for themselves). We already pay these people enough through the state and federal governments.
JANGA
|
August 20, 2010
Nettie Davis:

PLEASE find another card to play....that one is getting sooooo old and worn around the edges....and it is not as if you have a good Poker Face....everyone knows the ONLY card you hold.
LarryDickman
|
August 20, 2010
Soooo....the next step would be to commission a new study to develop a plan that would not be as expensive as what the first study predicted.

Or could it be that the Council didn't want to open the door for the "who gets to sit up front" controversy that would certainly come up here in the "All American City"?

Peace Out

PS looks like they had their secret meeting on this, huh
americasgone
|
August 20, 2010
Well congratulations! Finally they make a decision many of us can agree with. Now lets get a new firetruck.