The move will save the USPS $181,000 annually and eliminate six positions.
It’s among dozens of mail-processing consolidations nationwide as the USPS seeks to reduce operating costs amid declining patronage.
“We’re doing what any other business would do, which is to take a look at things and see where we can reap some savings,” USPS spokeswoman Beth Barnett told the Daily Journal.
The consolidation will take place by Oct. 1; Tupelo workers were notified Wednesday. Those whose positions are effected will be reassigned to other areas, the USPS said.
Mail is processed in Tupelo at the Thomas Street branch, which includes sorting, categorizing, stamping and shipping letters and packages originating from communities whose area codes begin with 388.
As part of the plan, those functions would occur in Memphis. And mail sent from this area would trade its Tupelo postmark for one bearing the Memphis name. Customers who bring mail to the local post office customer service desk and request a Tupelo postmark can continue to get it, however.
“As is the case with the Postal Service as a whole, the Tupelo office has been experiencing a decline in mail volume, and the Memphis Mail Processing & Distribution Center has underutilized capacity,” said Mississippi District Manager Elizabeth Johnson.
“This consolidation will contribute toward the Postal Service’s goal of increasing efficiency and improving productivity. Optimizing our processing network like this will help the Postal Service remain viable to provide mail service for all Americans.”
The USPS first announced Tupelo’s potential consolidation in October when it launched an internal study of its anticipated cost savings. At a packed public hearing in January at the Link Centre, many people spoke out against the plan. They warned of delayed mail delivery, the loss of Tupelo’s postmark and the general decline of postal service.
They had the support of several elected officials. Among those who publicly opposed the consolidation were Tupelo Mayor Jack Reed Jr. and the City Council, the Lee County Board of Supervisors, both Mississippi senators and U.S. Rep. Travis Childers.
A decision was supposed to have been announced 60-90 days after the public-comment period ended in late January, but it didn’t come until this week. Barnett said the earlier time line simply was an estimate and that studies of some cities require more time. She didn’t say what factors led to the delay of Tupelo’s announcement, nor did she point to any one reason why its consolidation was approved.
Others, like one proposed earlier for Hattiesburg, have been denied.
In addition to Tupelo’s extra mail volume – some 50,000 pieces per day, by Barnett’s estimate – Memphis also will handle mail from Jackson, Tenn. The USPS had approved consolidating that city’s outgoing mail processing earlier this summer. It went into effect July 1.
Barnett said Memphis will have no trouble taking the additional mail and that none of the communities should notice any difference in service.
Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.












Still making up stuff too- just a suggestion- putting things in quotes doesn't make them facts. And what would it take to abolish the USPS? Well, first of all, convincing the American people that they don't need it. Teabaggers notwithstanding, the postal service is still the best liked, most trusted agency in government, and its also much better respected than most private sector companies.
sheesh. what would a government program/service have to do to justify abolishment?
Now then, let's get back to the subject we were discussing- how you were completely wrong about the USPS adding to the federal deficit (when the reality is that it has been reducing it!). I guess that foot must still be stuck in your mouth, because you didn't seem to mention it?
PS- fun fact for your next teabagging party- the Post Office is specifically mentioned in the Constitution. The "Free Market" is NOT. Ain't that funny?
Those deficits will ultimately come home to roost on the backs of the taxpayers.
If it weren't for these hidden taxes on postal customers, the USPS would have been running a profit for the last 5 years, even with the decline in volume.
The independent auditor's report detailing all this is at http://bit.ly/avfoz5
Feel free to remove your foot from your mouth!
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/04/gao_postal_service_business_no.html?hpid=topnews
The USPS runs a huge deficit and is funded either by the general fund or debt (ie. on the backs of current taxpayers or future taxpayers). The business model for the USPS is so poor that the Government Accountability Office see the problem.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/04/gao_postal_service_…
You may want to pay particular attention to the following quote:
"If no action is taken, risks of larger USPS losses, rate increases and taxpayer subsides will increase," GAO said.
You can now take your foot out of your mouth.