Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Fake pot ban heads to council
by Emily LeCoz/NEMS Daily Journal
19 months ago | 1812 views | 10 10 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Fake pot often is sold in little packets or in small vials. They’re labeled as herbal incense, but people smoke the mixture as they would marijuana.
Fake pot often is sold in little packets or in small vials. They’re labeled as herbal incense, but people smoke the mixture as they would marijuana.
slideshow
TUPELO - A proposed ban against an intoxicating herb will go to the City Council on Tuesday, just one week after municipal leaders learned about the substance.

If passed, the ordinance will prohibit people in Tupelo from buying, selling, distributing, offering, using or having the product. Its most common name is Spice, but it's sold under more than a dozen different labels, including Genie and K2.

Violators could face up to $1,000 in fines and six months in jail, according to the ordinance.

Although sold as herbal incense, the products are sprayed with a chemical that mimics the effects of marijuana when ingested. Users smoke it and get high.

Tupelo Police Chief Tony Carleton had proposed the ban earlier this week after discovering its availability in the city. The Daily Journal had found it in at least one Tupelo convenience store, as well as in two tobacco shops just outside the city.

The ban would not affect the ability of stores outside Tupelo to sell the substance.

Spice and its equivalents are not yet regulated in the United States and are therefore still legal. But Tupelo leaders are following the lead of other municipalities by passing its own ban of the product.

Unlike most ordinances that require 30 days to take effect, though, the one banning Spice would become active immediately after passage.

It's currently on the council's study agenda, which means the council must first move it to the action agenda before voting on it. It typically takes two meetings before the vote occurs, making an Aug. 3 passage likely.

In special cases, however, the council can decide to take immediate action on a study agenda item.

Other Mississippi cities that have passed similar bans are Gautier, Horn Lake, Moss Point and Gautier. Natchez also is considering one.

Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.
Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anewday23
|
November 08, 2010
Aren't they fighting a never-ending battle? As soon as they ban one chemical, it seems there are several new ones to replace it. http://www.k2herbincense.com/ claims to have stuff that is legal in every single state. Are they going to keep banning these substances as they come up? That's going to be costly and as you can see, not so effective.

tupelogirl
|
July 19, 2010
First of all how can they banned this product they're calling "fake pot" when it is not sold, advertised or solicited as fake pot? I've seen the packaging & it clearly states that it is "herbal INSCENTS" & "Not for human consumption." Which goes back to point from several other post, many products that are sold for various reasons are used to get high & they're not banned nor will they be. Also there are many different LEGAL products on the market that give you highs, buzzes, rushes etc. that are similar to other street drugs. Convenient stores are stocked full of energy drinks, pills, & powders that give a cocaine/speed type rush, but no problems there! There is now a drink on the market to give you a calm relaxed feeling marketed as the "anti/energy drink," no problems with that either! So why choose to banned this product? 
steven1975
|
July 18, 2010
Ok, I sell these products to stores. What’s the difference between it, spray paint and contact cement. All are abused and I understand that, but you haven’t seen spray paint or contact cement banned in the news, or in the newspapers which have both been around a lot longer than incense or spice. In one of my better stores close to tupelo since he started selling incense about 01 May 2010 last week his profits were $4089.00. He told me he made .06 to .10 per gallon of gas he sold that week so in order to make the same profits off his gas at best he would have to sell approximately 40890 gallons, and also the state collected $611.00. I made part of my living off it and the guy I get it from also made part of his living off this store. Luckily for this store, all the people mentioned above are not in Tupelo. If you said major warning signs about the possible health problems I would gladly accommodate that the day it was suggested or made into law if at all possible without waiting till the dead line as it is in Alabama and Tennessee. I am sure the last night we can sell these items we will be extra busy doing super sells in bulk as well as telling customers where they may continue to purchase their items even if the whole state of Mississippi makes it illegal in Tupelo. You have Alabama about 45 minutes away and Memphis about one and half hours away. I wish the people making this major decision would look at the tough economic times we are in before jumping to a knee jerk decision and hurting several people that are local and can't currently find another job that will pay their bills and take care of their families. Even if it is made illegal it will be bought in other areas that will gladly take the profits and taxes. Also Alabama and Tennessee both made these items illegal on 01 Jul 2010 and both already have items with the same effect for sale that comply with all the requirements of the new law and it was no down time in Tennessee and less than a week in Alabama, it’s just aggravating. I am not afraid to admit it’s the most money I have ever made in my life. Give us regulations to follow and punish those that can't follow them. Issue fines which can support the education on drugs for our children.
shasar
|
July 18, 2010
What's next? Chocolate?
i'mbroke
|
July 17, 2010
Pretty soon Tupelo is going to have so many ordinances that people just driving through the city will be breaking one of them. LOL!
WTFDude
|
July 17, 2010
They're unable to solve the real problems facing Tupelo, so they take on these fake issues to make it appear as if they're actually doing something.

Tupelo's "leadership" doesn't seem to be good at anything other than looking STUPID and they have definitely mastered that!!

Woolhat
|
July 17, 2010
Oh, Lord!

Something being abused? H*ll, let's ban it!

Will this madness ever end?

OK, let me join (hypothetically) this parade. Let's ban: spandex on fat gals, cell phones on every living mother lover on the continent, TV monitors in motor vehicles, that KFC "sandwich" of two fried chicken breasts with bacon and cheese between, loud radios playing tunes that feature something that sounds like "fock" every third measure, televangelists, telemarketers (Oh, wait, we did that already -- How did that work out?), tailgaters (Yeah, I know, you're picturing an 18-wheeler, but most of them are young, white, female, driving a Japanese brand, and have a cell-phone affixed to their ear), television lawyers, etc., etc.

Sheesh! This is America, folks! It ain't our civic duty to pass another law forbidding every single recreational activity so that Andy and Barney can sit in the office talking about girl friend problems instead of pounding their beats.

Besides, if it hadn't been for the DJ article, most NE Mississippians wouldn't have heard of the Threat-to-civilization-as-we-know-it-de-jour.

So, what if we ban newspapers and web sites?

Oh, that's already been tried, has it?

Oh, Lord! I need a beer. But, damn!, that's illegal where I live.
anti-state
|
July 17, 2010
if the spineless council passes this dribble, welcome to the police state.

chief carlton dictates what he wants legal or illegal and the gutless council members meekly comply.

and people think they live in the "land of the free." what a freakin joke

straightsense
|
July 17, 2010
Interesting position. Ban something that is otherwise legal ? Mot listed under federal or state law as a controlled substance ?

Now I don't smoke dope, never have nor will I smoke this stuff. My concern is what authority does the city have to come up with its own list of items to ban ? Will Pam Cooking Spray be next ? It has been abused to the users ill being to the point of some deaths. Many other items are also used for highs.

This is a knee jerk reaction by folks that don't have the experience to deal with something. I remember when some controlled substances were being manufactured and altered to be a molecule off from the defined substance to escape being unlawful. Bottom line, the law was changed to include derivatives etc.

This a bad idea that will backfire. I don't expect many would challenge it, but there will be one somewhere that will cost Tupelo. The other side is what will Tupelo knee jerk and ban next? I do have a gut feeling Council, law enforcement etc could find themselves in individual capacity lawsuits as this appears to fall way outside their official capacity duties.