Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

EDITORIAL: Consolidation
by NEMS Daily Journal
24 months ago | 563 views | 3 3 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gov. Barbour’s special Commission on Education Structure, whose recommendations and findings haven’t been presented, has veered away from the governor’s proposal of merging 50 districts (of the 152 statewide) and, as a byproduct of its work, its own consultant says the savings envisioned by Barbour’s original proposal won’t immediately become possible.

However, in the broader and longer view, the commission’s work seems likely to arrive at recommendations that could strengthen the process by which struggling and failing Mississippi school districts receive transformative assistance for the long term.

The commission, led by Tupelo banker Aubrey Patterson, was formed because Barbour proposed reducing Mississippi’s school districts from 152 to 100 as a way of saving money in the face of financial shortfalls unprecedented since the Great Depression of the 1930s. He said $65 million in savings could be realized within a year of consolidation’s implementation.

The consultant and other experts say no. In fact, additional funds would be required as incentives for strong districts to consolidate with weak and failing districts, a reasonable conclusion given an expected recoil by strong institutions at the prospect of risking weakness in merging with struggling peers.

An unarticulated question must come into play: If strong districts receive financial incentives to merge with weak districts where will the incentive funding come from? Will Peter be robbed to pay Paul? Will other school districts lose some funding to merger of other districts? The state’s financial situation requires asking the questions, and receiving full answers.

The expense-reduction assumptions were among the first casualties of the commission’s work because its own independent consultant found that consolidation would actually require more spending initially and that savings would be long term and possibly more modest than hoped.

Discussions have led so far to consideration of other issues, too, which is a good airing of views about consolidation beyond its status as a rhetorical tool frequently used by politicians at many levels.

Consolidation should be proposed, as the governor noted in his charge to the commission, under a scenario that achieves the best comprehensive improvements, including strengthened learning and teaching, not just achieving savings.

Patterson, who also is a trustee of the state Institutions of Higher Learning and chairman of BancorpSouth, the state’s largest financial institution, said the commission knows any recommendations will require legislative approval.

Partial success often leads to larger success in the long term.

If the commission – in consultation and collaboration with the Mississippi Board of Education – agrees on a prioritized agenda and joins forces, the probability of success improves.

Should school districts be consolidated for academic strength and efficiency statewide?


Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
fwiw
|
May 28, 2010
What's most unfortunate is that our political leaders are afraid to face the facts and deal with them, Tractor. The racial/class issue continues to cripple this state as it has for 150 years.
TRACTORS
|
May 28, 2010
fwiw - unfortunately you are correct. If the school districs that have deep pockets get their State funding cut back they just raise the local tax by the 4 mills that does not require voter approval. That gets the monkey off the Gov and Legislaters back since they cut taxes - did not raise any taxes! The problem with the poorer districs like Drew, Ms there is no tax base to tax -everyone except a select well off planters there is no one to be taxed. The well off send their children to the private acadamedy and would just as soon not have to pay any school taxes. Drew was one of the targeted schools listed in the first of the reports. If you do not believe that listen to MS talk radio from 10:00 - 1:00. Should they consolidate with the Indianola school system or the Sunflower schools system, some of the children will have a 40 -50 mile ride to school if not more. My guess would be the cost of fuel and busses along will be much greater than eliminating a local school board and principal. Unfortunately this is the situation all over the Delta. There is no simple solution to this problem. I do know if we continue to cut school funding it can only get worse. Yes I know some of these students need more supervision at home -but it is hard to show the "world" to a child that has never left Sunflower or Tallahatchie County or for that matter Lee or Pontotoc County because they were so poor and their parents were never educated to know there was a 'world" they could be a part of. We in Miss have worked over the years to "keep" every one in their "class" brackets and we have succeded. We need a better aproach and I certainly hope we can find one. I am of the retirement age and have seen a world of change since the 50 -60' but we sure have a long way to go.
fwiw
|
May 28, 2010
Everyone who speaks on this issue is tip-toeing around the key problem. Prosperous school districts have the deep pockets needed to subsidize the states funding and offer much more than the poorer districts. The poorer districts will likely remain stagnant and poor while the prosperous districts are free keep spending more and moving ahead unless there is a drastic, statewide change in the funding. The state cannot move ahead with the wealthier districts copping the attitude "I've go mine, now you get yours." We have all these disrticts to enable the wealthy districts to isolate themselves from the desperately poor districts.