Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Panel denies Spain House demolition
by Emily Le Coz/NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1676 views | 15 15 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Spain House
Spain House
slideshow
TUPELO – Calvary Baptist Church will appeal a city group’s denial of its demolition permit after a tense meeting Monday about the Spain House.

The church, which owns the century-old house, asked the Historic Preservation Commission to allow its demolition.

As an alternative, the church offered the house to Tupelo at no cost in hopes the city would find it a new location within two years. But the offer stood only if the church could demolish the structure should the city fail to move the house within that time frame.

Commission members denied the demolition request and, while intrigued by the offer, ultimately declined because it left open the possibility of demolition.

Some church supporters in the crowd loudly grumbled at the decision, which also prompted some verbal sparring between the commission and church spokesman Greg Pirkle.

Commission members said they’d recommend the offer to the City Council if the church would forget about demolition. But church Pirkle said no.

“You’re asking the church to give you a two-year period and then come back and go through the same thing again, the same debacle … ,” Pirkle said. “The church gets nothing from what you’re offering. It may not be your intent, but it’s the result.”

Commission member Doyce Deas said the group might require more than two years to secure grants and other funding sources to relocate and renovate the three-story structure. She asked for more leniency, but Pirkle said two years should be enough.

“I had hoped that the church would want this to work out,” Deas said.

Responded Pirkle: “I had hoped that the city would work with us.”

If the city doesn’t take the house, he noted, it can’t apply for grants or historic status. But the church won’t offer the house without the caveat. And it won’t seek grants or funding itself, he said.

Calvary bought the Spain House along with several other properties in 2006. Plans to renovate it proved cost prohibitive. The church now wants to use the site for a parking lot, Pirkle said.

Several City Council members attended the public hearing, which was held at 5 p.m. at City Hall. Ward 3 Councilman Jim Newell offered to discuss the issue further with all parties, hoping for a suitable agreement.

The council likely will deal with the issue soon: Pirkle said his group will appeal the demolition denial to the city Planning Committee, which makes its recommendation to the council.

The church’s offer still stands if demolition is included after two years, Pirkle said. But he said the appeal will focus on the immediate destruction permit; not the offer.

Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.
Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
straightsense
|
May 25, 2010
I forgot to mention....I hear it is haunted. Maybe from being an old funeral home or something. They could rent it out to ghost busters like some of the Northeastern ghost towns do. Probably bring in more visitors than the bike path from East Tupelo to downtown Tupelo.

Might be the evil spirits Calvary is trying to get rid of. They should start with the ones walking the earth in the flesh first.
straightsense
|
May 25, 2010
If it were the average Joe, city would cut grass, place a lien on property and then order it uninhabitable and torn down. Being the upper crust are involved, they would probably hire a study from an out of town group, to give a recommendation that they would ignore, hire their favorite contractor, tear it down to rebuild it (remember downtown mall) after giving the elite top price and pass on the benefit of paying for it to the taxpayers under the guise of a temporary tax that would be renewed forever. It would then be renamed for some local person that had nothing to do with it until the end phase.
nutcase
|
May 25, 2010
it was things like this that kept Deas from being elected.
LarryDickman
|
May 25, 2010
Is it any wonder that folks don't want to be annexed into Tupelo? How is it that Tupelo has got to the point where American citizens who live within that city under occupation cannot dispose of their own property as they see fit?

It's disgusting
nutcase
|
May 25, 2010
i hardly ever do down main st to get anywhere but the other day noticed FUM expanded....what properties were torn down for that?

what would the city do if Calvary just totally let the property go...no upkeep what so ever, not even mowing? just a question.
fwiw
|
May 25, 2010
If someone has a great hankering to save that termite nest it seems they can have it for FREE. And it would be so grand and stately if located on Carnation St, adjacent to Mill Village. Certainly some of that vacant land near the historic Carnation Milk plant might be available. If only one of the proponents were financially able to help out without stretching their budget too thinly. Just a thought.
WTFDude
|
May 25, 2010
I have a question. Did Calvary Baptist Church not know that there was a house potentially of some historic value on that lot before they bought it?

If it were me and there was such a house on a lot I was interested in buying, I think I'd make the current owners get the demolition permits, etc., BEFORE I closed on the property.

If they were unwilling or unable to do that, I wouldn't purchase the lot.

Or, if as the article says, they were planning on restoring the house when they bought it and later found out it was going to be too expensive, then they should have done a better job of estimating the restoration expenses BEFORE they bought the house.

I see this as a potential "buyer beware" situation. They seemed to have not done adequate "due diligence" prior to purchasing the property.

eric_cartman
|
May 25, 2010
i agree with bird OOOPs it fell down in the middle of the night
straightsense
|
May 25, 2010
Instead of using the money for all these bike trails, walkway from East Tupelo to downtown, 60 g's for loan of an aircraft, circle walkways with flowers etc etc etc...........take the house for free, move it and let Calvary Baptist and Pirkle have their vacant lot. Maybe they will put something on it that can be taxed highly.

Pirkle vs Dees fight. Both lost their previous elite city positions and can't stand it. If Tupelo wants to preserve it, take possession and move it. Flower trails can wait.
WTFDude
|
May 25, 2010
Now the city will probably go out and hire a consultant to study the issue and tell them what to do since they can't seem to make any decisions without some expensive study, formulation of a commission or consulting engagement.
LeeCoDave
|
May 25, 2010
Give it time, nature will take care of it.
tupelojoe81
|
May 25, 2010
or find some termites to put in there.
BirdZ!
|
May 25, 2010
I hope Calvary will go ahead and tear it down, despite the denial and the bickering by the city. Just surprise everybody one morning with the bulldozer and wrecking ball.

Can't stop them then. Who would want to look at a partially demolished house?
tupelojoe81
|
May 25, 2010
this is the dumbest thing ever. Why wasnt this brought up when Calvary was purchasing the house/lot? They (Calvary) knew they would tear it down. Let it rot now, let it rot.
anti-state
|
May 25, 2010
This is a microcosm of why government is inherently evil. Private property rights always get crushed by the "we know what's best for everyone" government bobbleheads. And as usual it's someone like Deas whose family made a massive fortune via free markets who ends up using government to now tell everyone else how to manage their own affairs.

I'm sure in the end the pathetic council will likewise trample on the rights of the property owner. Disgusting