Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Tupelo annexation case resumes with disputes
by Emily Le Coz/NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1009 views | 5 5 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TUPELO – After a month hiatus, Tupelo’s annexation trial resumed Monday with an attempt to toss out new evidence and discredit a witness.

The legal arguing took most of the day, leaving little time for the testimony of Tupelo’s expert witness Karen Fernandez.

Tupelo wants to annex 16.15 square miles of unincorporated territory, a move opposed by Lee County and the cities of Saltillo and Plantersville. The trial started March 29 and is expected to last several more weeks.

County attorney Chad Mask spent the morning disputing the city’s attempt to add new evidence into trial.

The evidence had been entered during the hiatus and served mainly to update existing documents previously discussed at trial. Mask said that, if allowed, the new evidence would render obsolete weeks of testimony and months of pre-trial preparation endured by all parties.

City attorney Billy Spencer disagreed, saying it sought only to clarify issues raised during trial as well as provide the most recent statistical data.

By noon, Judge Edward C. Prisock had allowed some new evidence, but not all.

It was then Jason Herring’s turn to thwart Tupelo’s case. He spent much of the afternoon disputing Ferndandez’ status as an expert witness for the city.

Herring argued that because Fernandez didn’t base her opinions on a reproducible methodology, her testimony couldn’t be considered expert. He cited a legal rule called the “Daubert standard,” which sets standards for expert opinions.

Mask and Plantersville attorney Brian Starling joined Herring in the objection.

Fernandez told the court she’d never heard of the Daubert standard. She also revealed that Mask himself had hired her as an expert witness in two previous annexation trials elsewhere.

Ultimately, Prisock allowed Fernandez as an expert witness. Her testimony, which supports Tupelo’s case for annexation, began in the late afternoon and will resume this morning.

Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
straightsense
|
May 25, 2010
The Judge was dressed in an elegant, flowing, freshly pleated, dark black nightgown setoff with wide, open sleeves. City Attorneys wore fashions supplied by Reed's Department Store which were routinely refreshed during breaks. County Attorneys wore hand me down mix matched suit coats which were sized to allow for inter changing between them to give that fresh for work look.

Spectators were screened at the entrance for any Walmart, Sears, etc attire and not allowed in. Homeland Security Officers were clad in dark sunglasses and traditional black suit and white shirt. Emergency Response personnel were visionary in their departmental issued uniforms. Undercover FBI and other law enforcement were excluded from the proceeding and were dressed in an array of different clothing but all showed up in pointed toe (cockroach killers) cowboy boots.

The Sheriff and Chief of Police both wore dual sidearms with extra ammo slung across their shoulders in an OK Corral fashion.
nutcase
|
May 25, 2010
they left out the most important part...what did everyone wear?
DFWSpiderman
|
May 25, 2010
Doggone:

I know Henderson personally, and you are correct, he is an excellent lawyer. He moved up here recentl;y from jackson and opened his firm. He also prosecutes for the City of Saltillo in municipal court. He can tear a witness up. I see him as possibly a young Jimmy Doug Shelton--who is the best lawyer ever in these parts.

The Herring guy works for him and fills in when Henderson is busy handling other court matters. You are correct, the city would be in better hands if Henderson could be there during this annexation case full-time. In addition to prosecuting, he does a good bit of felony criminal work, and so he cannot be at the annexation trial everyday, although he would like to, if possible.
straightsense
|
May 25, 2010
The fresh beginning of a judicially controlled outcome. Why was it necessary to halt the trial in the first place ? They have had years preparing in one form or another.

Kinda reminds me of a case where the prosecution and defense had rested and the defense was way ahead. Judge then allowed evidence to be admitted without defense even having opportunity to cross examine it. Turned the tide and guy convicted.

I've always said a judge can controll the outcome of a case by the way they conduct the trial.
Dawggone
|
May 25, 2010
That J. R. Herring guy is not as good as the Henderson Alan that was representing Saltillo a few weeks ago. Henderson must be working at his chicken wing resteraunt today, or he would be there tearing up the City again.

Come on back Henderson, we need you to get these bogus experts. We don't want to be Tupelo citizens.