Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Analysis: Miss. gov't workers' benefits weakening
by Emily Wagster Pettus/The Associated Press
21 months ago | 1181 views | 4 4 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Mississippi state employees aren't likely to become the next Donald Trump. But plenty of people like government jobs because of the predictable hours, decent health insurance and attractive retirement plan.

Because of changes in recent years, being a civil servant in Mississippi is not as good a deal as it used to be.

Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, a bipartisan majority of lawmakers and nonpartisan governing boards have changed some workers' insurance coverage and reconfigured retirement benefits. The results? Smaller paychecks when raises were scarce, and, for future public employees, the prospect of working longer before collecting a pension.

The changes are largely a response to the shaky economy, and private sector employees are seeing similar cuts in benefits.

The level of health insurance coverage varies depending on when an employee started in Mississippi government. The plan covers about 200,000 people — workers for state agencies, school districts, community colleges, universities and libraries, plus their dependents.

Those hired on or before Dec. 31, 2005, are called "legacy" employees, and the state pays 100 percent of their premiums.

Those hired on or after Jan. 1, 2006, are called "horizon" employees. The state pays 100 percent of their premiums for a lesser level of coverage. If they want the same coverage as "legacy" employees, they've been paying $18 a month.

Earlier this year, Barbour signed a bill that could make health insurance more expensive for state workers. A governing board for the insurance plan will meet May 26 to discuss potential changes.

Currently, the health insurance plan has a $500 annual deductible. Lawmakers say to keep the plan financially stable, the deductible could increase dramatically — perhaps to $1,000 or $1,800 a year.

Employees might get an option of making a monthly payment to "buy down" the deductible. That is, their deductible would be higher than $500 but less than, say, $1,800. The amounts of the new deductible and the monthly "buy down" are undecided.

"We've just got to keep the plan healthy as much as we can," said Senate Insurance Committee Chairman Eugene "Buck" Clarke, R-Hollandale.

Starting next year, people who become state employees will have to work longer before collecting pensions. Under current law, retirement is possible after 25 years' service. Because of a bill Barbour signed this year, anyone hired on or after July 1, 2011, must work 30 years. Those already on the payroll then will stick with 25.

The Mississippi Economic Council, a state chamber of commerce, lobbied to increase the required years of service to keep experienced teachers in public school classrooms.

"They don't stop teaching," said MEC President Blake Wilson. "They go teach across the line, or they go teach at a private school."

The number of years required for retirement has changed three times since 1987. The current system of "25 and out" has been in place since 1991.

At Barbour's request, lawmakers voted last month to require public employees to pay 9 percent of their paychecks toward their own retirement, up from the current 7-1/4 percent. Brenda Scott, head of the Mississippi Alliance of State Employees, said the change amounts to a pay cut that makes public service less attractive.

Barbour said the pension change was needed to keep some employees from losing their jobs. Nobody likes to hear, as Trump would say, "You're fired."
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
justamerican
|
May 17, 2010
I think the gov't jobs should go to the Social Security system and the insurance should be the average of the people in the state that is paying their insurance. We have to go to 66 now to get SS benefits. I think they should also since they are paid for so many days each year that they don't have time to get the JOB done.

Hey, I thought they retired the day they started.
i'mbroke
|
May 17, 2010
straightsense:I actually called the IRS and ask if I could claim a non relative if I paid more than half their expenses and they said YES !!! I find it for relatives but don't find anything for non relatives.

That seems to be correct because I know of a fat lady who has a non-working man living with her. She claimed him on her tax return and got a large refund quite disproportionate for the amount money she makes.
straightsense
|
May 17, 2010
The spend it or lose it government budget kills ordinary working class citizens. If they need more, just pass it on to the taxpayer.

I'll agree. Many drawing a check that don't deserve it.Heck, if you can draw as much in benefits or more by not working, why work ?

Heck, your tax money paid for some local legislators and state employees expenses to eat, drink, party etc and then pay for them to get stomach bands to loose weight.

Many of the programs are well intended yet abused. Heck one of the biggest scams I hear about is blacks that have several chillins. They collect government assistance, then come tax time they sell their "overage" chillins to a relative and they claim they raised them for Earned Income Credit. I hear $800.00 cash a child is the going rate. I actually called the IRS and ask if I could claim a non relative if I paid more than half their expenses and they said YES !!! I find it for relatives but don't find anything for non relatives.
bigedefense
|
May 17, 2010
As usual, punish those of us who work for a living. Why don't we start taking sales tax from food stamps, or cut government freebies? I am sure there will be plenty who will get upset because I feel this way, but as of today, I can still feel and say what I want. That may change soon enough, so I better get it said before that is taken away too! Also, please do not say that government freebies have been cut, I have family that works at various agencies, and they are NOT seeing anything close to what working people are feeling! I am for the government helping people through a rough patch in life, but IT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A WAY OF LIFE!!! In my opinion, and it is just that, if the government handouts were given only to those that needed them, and only for a specified amount of time, then we would be well ahead of where we are now financially. As far as disability is concerned, I recently had a contractor over to discuss fixing some storm damage to my house and he wanted to be paid in cash because he was on disability!!! He did not get my business. DO you think that he is the only person that does this???