Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

EDITORIAL: A sidewalk grid
by NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1213 views | 4 4 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tupelo’s consideration of an ordinance requiring “Complete Streets” – including sidewalks – is an issue rising from appropriate development standards and long-term quality-of-life issues.

Tupelo’s oldest neighborhoods, including some where properties are among the city’s most desirable, have sidewalks.

Neighborhoods farther from the city’s historic center – and newer – mostly don’t have sidewalks, and that’s unfortunate because sidewalks are practical, safe and attractive, all value-adding features.

The concerns about increased costs are understandable from the viewpoint of developers, but the mandate for sidewalks would take effect after a period in which the cost of sidewalks, curbs and bike lanes could be factored in before developments are started.

Retrofitting existing streets to include sidewalks would be a long-term process in which the city would bear the cost.

The City Council, unless plans change, will vote Feb. 2 on an ordinance requiring Complete Streets, a national model that includes sidewalks and bike lanes, handicap access and benches.

Tupelo would become the first Mississippi city to adopt the standard, but it is spreading in other southern states.

The idea basically makes pedestrians and bicycle users larger stakeholders in every street built. Streets, built and/or maintained with everyone’s taxes, and with costs recouped if paid by developers, maintained with all taxpayers’ money, should serve the interest of all users.

Streets without sidewalks don’t fully meet the needs of pedestrians, and without bike lanes, streets aren’t optimally safe for bikers.

Two age groups in particular need sidewalks:

n Roads without sidewalks don’t meet the needs of the growing population of older Americans. Census statistics project that by 2025, the portion of Americans over 65 will increase from 12 percent to nearly 20 percent, 62 million people. Their mobility becomes more limited as many give up driving, but not necessarily walking. Sidewalks obviously increase the mobility of older people for a longer time better than the uneven, unshouldered edges of streets.

The Complete Streets organization Website says that 47 percent of Americans over 50 say they cannot cross main roads near their home safely. Almost 40 percent of neighborhoods do not have adequate sidewalks, while another 55 percent reported no bike lanes or paths.

n Similarly, the lack of sidewalks pushes kids to play, run and bike in streets, an invitation to injury.

In the long term, sidewalks promote better health because they are an invitation to exercise walking as well as walking for errands and other personal appointments.

A complete grid of sidewalks, of course, becomes another citywide network of public transit.

Do you support requiring sidewalks in all Tupelo neighborhoods?


Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
E=mc2
|
January 25, 2010
X maybe it's just me ...I don't see many cyclist in Tupelo.I drive the streets all day everyday.Are you telling me there are hundreds of people that would ride there bikes to work from November to March if we spent all tax payers money to fund bike paths.What about May to October?I think this idea is headed up by a few for a few...A side walk a safe place for kids to play?What about all the Big scary dogs people are walking?Creep maybe you should have purchased a home that isn't on McCullough blvd?I say that because MOST streets in Tupelo can be enjoyed by an avid walker.I'm just not hearing about all the pedestrians getting run over?If I was a builder I would build were there is money to be made...Saltilo comes to mind.Their Mayor isn't trying to get into the pockets of the folks that "build"their city.
ultracreep
|
January 22, 2010
I am an avid walker, and I would love to have more sidewalks in Tupelo. It would be a lot easier and safer to walk to the store to pick up a thing or two if we had more sidewalks. It encourages people to get out and exercise without having to worry about being hit by cars. All in all, just a good idea.
aletce40
|
January 22, 2010
Great editorial.

Now, follow up with Pat Falkner and ask him why Tommy Morgan was not required to install sidewalks in his new subdivision, Lake Circle, in west Tupelo. The connecting subdivisions, Woodside Circle and Lakefield II, have sidewalks throughout, yet Lake Circle has none. It really smells of favoritism toward Morgan by the Planning Department. On top of no sidewalks, the streets that will someday have to be maintained by the city have already collapsed in several places and have be band-aid repaired by Morgan. Very smelly indeed.
XTINADOROUGH26
|
January 22, 2010
REQUIRING ALL NEIGHBORHOODS TO HAVE SIDEWALKS IS ESSENTIAL IN SUPPORTING GOOD HEALTH AND SAFETY. IT ALLOWS DOGWALKERS, RUNNERS, AND CHILDREN TO PLAY AND ENJOY THE OUTDOORS WITHOUT HAVING TO WALK/RUN ON THE STREET WHERE TRAFFIC CAN BE DANGEROUS. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT IT WOULD GIVE MORE INITATIVE FOR PEOPLE TO WALK OR BIKE TO WORK, WHICH I HIGHLY SUPPORT TO BECOME MORE GREEN! NOW IF WE CAN ONLY WORK ON BIKE RACKS IN PUBLIC PLACES AND AT WORK!