Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Burnham: Give board consolidation authority
by Bobby Harrison/NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1982 views | 2 2 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
JACKSON - Incoming state Superintendent Tom Burnham has weighed in on two of the biggest education issues that will face the Mississippi Legislature during the 2010 session.

Burnham, who will take over for his second stint as superintendent in January, said that perhaps the Mississippi Board of Education should be able to consolidate districts that the state takes over and should be able to establish charter schools in those districts.

Mississippi law gives the state board authority to take over chronically low-performing districts.

The issue of school district consolidation was brought to the forefront by Gov. Haley Barbour, who recommended in November reducing the number of districts from 152 to 100 as a cost-savings measure in his budget proposal.

But a legislatively created task force on low-performing school districts was studying the idea before Barbour made his recommendation.

The task force also has been studying charter schools. Mississippi's charter school law, which was labeled as weak by many charter school supporters, expired two years ago.

While charter schools can be defined in different ways, they are generally schools supported with public funds that have a specific mission, such as focusing on the sciences. They also have a different governing structure and do not have to adhere to all state mandates.

Burnham's suggestion to allow the state Board of Education to consolidate low-performing districts and even to create charter schools came during a recent meeting of the low-performing schools task force.

Burnham said he is making the recommendation because "in my mind you don't give it (the school system) back to the people who allowed it to fail to begin with."

With consolidation or charter schools, he said, "You are creating a new governing structure."

Burnham said that when he was superintendent in the 1990s, the state took over a failing North Panola School District and improved it, but now it is failing again.

"What happened in North Panola is that we have a new board and a new superintendent, but we need to engage the community," Burnham said. "We had them engaged to a certain extent when we left, but now they are disengaged."

Under Burnham's concept, the state board would not be able to consolidate a low-performing district with another district unless the neighboring district agreed to the merger.

Barbour has formed a commission to study school district consolidation. The commission is supposed to make a recommendation by April 1.

The governor hopes the Legislature will give the state Board of Education the authority to act upon that recommendation.

"You have to look at one district at a time in terms of consolidation," said Board of Education member Claude Hartley of Tupelo. "I don't think you can just pick a random number and say we need that many districts. But I am sure that we have some districts that would benefit from consolidation."

As for charter schools, Burnham said he wants to develop them "within the public school framework. We have to figure out how to do that."
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
E=mc2
|
December 28, 2009
I couldn't imagine giving school boards more authority.We{TAX PAYERS}should demand more light shed on school districts.If Charter schools are separate from public schools why would you let the people that created the need for them run them?Governor Barbour is on the right track...How about 6 school districts?Houston Texas has a population of 9 Million...ONE SCHOOL DISTRICT,Which has a high graduating rate.I wonder where the Governor was for the past 7 years? This should have been done long ago.I guess it's hard to get away from the good old boys way. When he should be doing the business of the people that elected him.I think we should follow money.MIKEOWEN you are on the right track.Kids that don't want to be in schools and PARENTS THAT CAN'T DO THERE JOB,should be weeded out into alternative schools at there parents expense. If you don't get a High School diploma or GED you can't be eligible for any social programs.Yes there is always exceptions,but very few.Parents do your jobs.Read to your kids,show them the inside of a library.Or better yet.Use a condemn if you don't want the JOB and RESPONSIBILITY of being a parent.
MIKEOWEN
|
December 28, 2009
this is a slippery slope. First the authority to consolidate low performing districts is only one step from the authority to consolidate any districts. Second, consolidate with whom ? Say for instance Aberdeen performs low so it is consolidated with Monroe county or god forbid Amory ? This would have the end result of bringing down the better school or if two poor performing districts were consolidated the old adage, "You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear" would hold true.

Alternative idea:

ZERO crap toleration policy. A public education is an opportunity and a right. Abuse the privilage and loose the right and opportunity.

Mandatory attendence laws are part of the blame for the low performance of Mississippi schools. 17-18 year olds that don't want to be in school should not be in school they are only a disruption.

Kindergarten is a failed component of 60's philosophy. Children need to be at home with a parent when they are 4,5 years old and not "in school". Do away with kindergarten and refocus those resoources on teaching mentally prepared children, not baby sitting.