Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

MSU's Sidney still sits, waits
by Brad Locke/NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1475 views | 7 7 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
STARKVILLE - As the NCAA's amateurism investigation of Renardo Sidney drags on toward 2010, an inevitable question arises: What is the point of no return?

That is, when does it become too late for Sidney, Mississippi State's 6-foot-10 freshman phenom, to step on the floor and be someone who can not only help, but make a huge impact for the Bulldogs?

Sidney will again be on the bench in street clothes tonight when MSU (7-2) takes on Wright State at Humphrey Coliseum.

The Bulldogs are starting to click and find the kind of chemistry that carried them to the 2009 SEC Tournament title. If Sidney wasn't cleared until, say, mid-January or later, after SEC play is in full swing, inserting him into the lineup would force State to adjust on the fly.

"I think he'll be a guy that naturally when you get him there's some huge adjustments being away from us," coach Rick Stansbury said. "But his talent level allows him to fit in pretty quick. Now you've got to get all that chemistry right and all that stuff.

"If it happens, when it happens, it'll be a good problem to have."

The case does not appear close to a resolution. Sidney's attorney, Donald Jackson, did not return a call from the Daily Journal seeking comment on Tuesday.

Jackson told FoxSports.com on Tuesday that the NCAA Eligibility Center has conducted several interviews with people it identified "more than six months ago" as relevant to the case.

"These people were identified to the NCAA and documentation was provided in late spring," Jackson told the Web site. "They are finally conducting interviews one-third of the way into the youngster's freshman season.

"Sidney is serving a suspension without having been found guilty of anything."

Contact Brad Locke at 678-1571 or brad.locke@djournal.com.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
tupelojoe81
|
December 16, 2009
yep, I still blame the NCAA for 85% of it, and the lawyer the other 15%. If Johnny Cochran were alive this would have been over! I dont mean that in any racism way either, just saying he got the job done.
Dawgfan01
|
December 16, 2009
I understand what they think "might" be a violation. The point is they have not said, this is what your violation is. The Sidneys and their lawyer say they have more than enough documentation showing how they paid the rent. In the end it is MSU taking a loss on this one, the kid may never play a game and go the the NBA next season. He will be one year removed from High School, so I guess he can enter the draft in 2010.
tupelojoe81
|
December 16, 2009
well the violation would be accepting money from AAU team and coaches to pay the rent in LA, which is definately a violation......they have no proof that they could afford that mansion they lived in.
Dawgfan01
|
December 16, 2009
He has to prove he is innocent of what? The NCAA has not established a violation nor charged him with one. It is really difficult to defend yourself when you don't even know what it is exactly you are being charged with. I know they are questioning how the Sidneys paid rent in L.A. but still the NCAA has not established a violation.
ezfreeze
|
December 16, 2009
tupelojoe81,

I believe you are right... But I think MSU would have to file an injunction or something like that and then they could play him... But MSU has already said they will not play Renardo Sidney unless he is cleared...

And the NCAA said before it is not their responsibility, but Sidney's to prove he is innocent... So it is not like a court of law where you are innocent to proven guilty...

He has to prove he is innocent... And I agree... If you play for Duke, Conn, Kansas or Kentucky type schools... There are different standards...
tupelojoe81
|
December 16, 2009
while you are somewhat right MR SUMBIGUNS, he could actually be playing right now. Technically, State could be playing him with ALOT of risks if he is actually proven guilty later on, then State would have to forfeit games that he played in.

I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he could play right now, just not without some guilt on State's side.

State is saying he is guilty until proven innocent. NCAA is just taking their freakin sweet time with this, which is the major problem.

PS, i dont think his lawyer is helping things out either.
M.R.SUMBIGUNS
|
December 16, 2009
This is an absolute travesty....The NCAA is is basically saying "guilty" until proven "innocent"....They simply do as they will....I guarantee had it been at Kentucky or one of the other big boys in NCAA basketball, he'd be on the court and playing by now.....