Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

EDITORIAL: Bold restructuring
by NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 611 views | 3 3 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gov. Haley Barbour
Gov. Haley Barbour
slideshow
Gov. Haley Barbour’s 2011 executive budget proposal would dramatically change the higher education and public school landscapes in Mississippi, if approved, and some of his restructuring proposals should be given thorough consideration by the Legislature.

Barbour’s executive budget proposal, as he previously warned, anticipates huge revenue shortfalls during the next two budget cycles – about $1.9 billion – which he would partially offset with 12 percent budget cuts in 2011 for most agencies and departments, slightly lower percentage cuts for K-12 education, and a dramatic shift in funding responsibility for basic, essential programs to individual school districts’ local taxpayer-funded reserve accounts.

He makes other unprecedented proposals, all certain to be met with controversy:

- Consideration of reducing the number of community colleges (and possibly eliminating their athletic programs).

- Merging Mississippi State University and Mississippi University for Women, but retaining the Columbus campus occupied by MUW, without full administrative overhead in Columbus.

- Merging Mississippi Valley (Itta Bena), Alcorn State (Lorman) and Jackson State universities, but keeping the Lorman and Itta Bena campuses open, reducing administrative costs.

- Moving the Mississippi School for the Arts from Brookhaven to the MUW campus, which houses the Mississippi School for Math and Science (both are high schools).

- “Eliminating or consolidating” programs not pulling their weight at the University of Mississippi, Delta State and Southern Mississippi.

Barbour estimates a $35 million savings in fiscal year 2012 if the mergers are approved for the 2011 budget.

Mississippi’s adequately supporting eight universities was a stretch even in the best economic times. The three smaller universities targeted for merger arguably can be stronger campuses under a different academic/administrative structure.

It’s doubtful that substantially shifting the financial burden for basic education to local districts – while cutting the Mississippi Adequate Education Program – can be accomplished without also shifting a higher tax burden to local districts and local taxpayers. That only shifts rather than solves the problem.

At the same time, serious consideration should be given to school-district consolidation plans that would reduce from 152 to 100 the number of districts statewide. We would go further. Consider merging districts of all kinds for administrative saving and other economies of scale, plus the potential for strengthening academic offerings.

Noting happens without legislative assent, and minds should be open to possibilities.

Would you support the merger of certain Mississippi universities to lower costs but without closing campuses?


Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Woolhat
|
November 18, 2009
Have you folks ever been to one of the public universities? Education is waaaaay down the list of priorities there. The "education cult" is the Sacred Cow of our society. Its devotees hope to get it "Third Rail" status, alongside Social Security.

Why cut education? Look at the figures. What dominates the budget?
5960lady
|
November 17, 2009
keep people uneducated, broke and just sick enough thats how people are kelp in line
ultracreep
|
November 17, 2009
I don't have a problem with consolidating the universities, per se, but why does he always seem to cut education? Isn't there something a little less necessary to get rid of?