Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

OPINION: The Earth isn’t flat; SEC football isn’t fixed
by Brad Locke/NEMS Daily Journal
2 years ago | 1254 views | 17 17 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
STARKVILLE - Against my better judgment, I am devoting this space today to officiating. Specifically, SEC football officials, that much-maligned group that’s about as popular as skinny dipping in the Amazon.

It’s been a bad October for the zebras. A slew of questionable – or outright blown – calls has led to the suspension of one crew and elicited criticism from several coaches, including Mississippi State’s Dan Mullen.

He feels the Bulldogs were robbed of a fumble recovery last week against Florida. Gator linebacker Dustin Doe had the ball knocked from his hand just before he crossed the goal line on an interception return, but a touchdown was granted and the replay official upheld the call.

“I don't know why we even have replay right now in the Southeastern Conference if they are not going to utilize it,” Mullen said Sunday. Those words, and many more like it, earned him a reprimand from SEC Commissioner Mike Slive.

I don’t have an explanation for this sudden rash of bad calls. Some other people do, though.

It’s a conspiracy!

The tinfoil hat wearers point to the fact that the most egregious officiating offenses have benefited Alabama, Florida and LSU, the top three teams in the conference. They argue that the SEC is trying to assure that one of those teams – most likely Alabama or Florida, both undefeated – winds up in the BCS championship game.

It’s like I tell the people who accuse me of being an Ole Miss homer/MSU hater: Conspiracy theories sound great until you start applying logic to them.

These people are assuming that the SEC is actually instructing officials to make calls that favor certain teams, even if those calls are clearly wrong and will get them suspended for several weeks.

“Uh, yeah, commish. I’d love to sacrifice doing what I love for a few weeks just to advance your nefarious plan for world domination.”

Let’s take a quick trip back to the recent past: Jan. 7, 2008. On that day, the LSU Tigers beat Ohio State to claim the BCS title, finishing the season with a 12-2 record.

Wait, whaaa? Two losses? Yeah, both in triple overtime, to Kentucky and Arkansas. Surely the officials could have found a call to make or not make in one or both of those games, because it wouldn’t have taken much to swing things in LSU’s favor in such tight contests.

But no, LSU lost those games fair and square. Just like LSU beat Georgia fair and square a few weeks ago, and like Florida beat Arkansas and MSU fair and square, and like Alabama beat Tennessee fair and square.

Does something need to be fixed with SEC officiating? Sure. I don’t know the solution – maybe it’s more accountability, more thorough replay review, or younger, more athletic officials – but I can’t buy that the problem is rooted in some secret plot to keep the SEC’s best teams at the top.

The truth: There was no second shooter on the grassy knoll, George W. Bush didn’t instigate 9/11, and the SEC’s best teams got to the top on their own.

Brad Locke (brad.locke@djournal.com) covers Mississippi State for the Daily Journal and blogs daily at NEMS360.com.
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
amoryrocks
|
October 29, 2009
Wow, Draws one of the worst comments I've seen even on this site No class at all.
ColoradoReb
|
October 29, 2009
Hahahahahahaha Draws done got up in Locke's coolaid.....got o mighty...thats funny Draws
mcwhirterr
|
October 29, 2009
Brad Locke did miss the point. As said by an earlier writer, none of my MSU flriends nor I, an MSU Grad are crying "Conspiracy!" It was simply a series of bad calls! Call it human or call it lazy or even saving face on the officials who made the call and didnt want to admit that they might be wrong, it was still bad calls. The problem is that those bad calls turned a potentially very close game which might have even gone into overtime into another loss for a recovering MSU team who are fighting hard to get their act back together and into a win for a team that everyone just assumes is good enough to be #1 because of their name.

Very similar to the fact that for years Alabama showed up very high in the polls because they were Alabama only to have a somewhat lackluster season.

Just remember, MSU sacked Tebow 3 times, pressured him into throwing the ball away 3 times and held them from making a first down on seven different occasions. Plus made 19 points. That is not a bad showing against the #1 team.

Bad calls are bad calls and obvioulsy through the suspension of one officiating team, the SEC at least agrees that it does happen.
jpceditor
|
October 29, 2009
If you want to disagree with Brad's opinion feel free. That is what the comments are for to provide a different opinion and to debate about what has been posted and written. The following comment from a poster isn't about the article or about a debate and is very offensive on several fronts - "if only your mother had been a better aim with a coat hanger we wouldn't be subjected to this crap." There is no need for that. Personal attacks about someone being killed as a young child on anyone here are not what these comments are about.

Keep it about the article and not people or you will be asked to leave.

Thanks,

Todd Vinyard

Online Editor
bwj1
|
October 29, 2009
The SEC is fixed. Just follow the money. Deeper pockets will always get the nod. Bama, LSU, FLA. Neither State or OM will ever have power house programs. College football is a business and businesses are here to make money. The more money the more power. The more power the more wins.
bwj1
|
October 29, 2009
BirdZ!
|
October 29, 2009
Why bring this back up? Mullen, Kiffin, Johnson, and Petrino, and the SEC have all moved on.

Good teams will always get the benefit of the doubt on close calls, whether its by human nature or instructions from the powers-that-be.
Braves Dawg
|
October 29, 2009
What doesn't wash is that BM can have an opinion, but a reader can't have an opinion on BM's "articles". It may not be plagiarism per se, but it's common knowledge that BM makes reference to terminology used at other sites. That two hour delay has its benefits if you can get away with it. If he thinks MSU fans get on him, he better pray he doesn't get switched with PA. The OM fans will burn a cross in his front yard. I hope he hasn't lost his contacts with the local HS football coaches.
MasterDawg
|
October 29, 2009
If LSU beat Georgia fair and square and Florida beat Arkansas fair and square, then why was the crew that did those two games suspended? As someone said, "that just don't wash".
aletce40
|
October 29, 2009
I don't know who Locke is talking to, but NONE of my MSU friends are screaming conspiracy. What we are screaming is "how the heck does the replay official miss that call?". Instead of writing an editorial about how bad the replay official missed calls in the Houston and Florida game, Locke throws stones at MSU fans because he thinks sarcasm equates in to good writing. Once again, this editorial misses the mark.
bradlocke
|
October 29, 2009
Using a tinfoil hat reference qualifies as plagiarism? Then I guess EDSBS is guilty of it, too, because they're not the first to mention tinfoil hats in conjunction with a conspiracy. You obviously need to look up the word "plagiarism," because you have no idea what it means. Which isn't surprising.
bradlocke
|
October 29, 2009
You read it. Therefore, you're a reader. See, that's how logic works. And I notice you still haven't refuted what I wrote (because you can't). Your crass comment – which is pretty weak compared to other things I've heard – makes me laugh, because it tells everyone what a childish idiot you are. You left me once; please, leave again. And never come back.
bradlocke
|
October 29, 2009
I love it when readers make snide remarks without actually offering up a reasoned rebuttal to what I've written. Which must mean they know I'm right. Thanks for the compliment.