OPINION: Want to ‘create’ jobs? Start with energy sector
by William F. Shughart
8 months ago | 359 views | 4 4 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
There are few sectors of the U.S. economy that provide as many jobs and generate as much wealth as the oil and natural gas industry. Roughly 9.2 million Americans are employed in oil and gas production – 83,820 in Mississippi alone plus another 114,194 in Tennessee. The industry’s total output accounts for about 7.2 percent of GDP.

Despite its obvious economic importance, the oil and gas industry is not part of the Obama administration’s solution to the nation’s unemployment problem. As a matter of fact, industry representatives were not invited to participate in the recent White House jobs summit.

Washington instead remains wedded to the idea that billions of dollars in taxpayer-financed “investments” to develop alternative sources of power that harness the energies of plant-life, the sun, the wind and the Earth’s own geothermal resources can wean Americans from fossil fuels and in the process create a superabundance of “green” jobs.

But the idea that such renewable energy sources soon will become commercially viable and employ large numbers of people historically has fallen short of expectations. It will continue to do so in the future. Solar and wind power still account for a tiny fraction of the nation’s total energy production, and, moreover, most of the components needed for solar arrays and wind turbines must be imported from abroad.

The inconvenient truth is that companies engaged in producing biofuels and other substitutes for oil and natural gas quickly would collapse if not for government handouts justified by the contentious claim that fossil-fuel burning is responsible for global warming.

By way of contrast, America’s oil and gas industry added 2 million new workers to the payroll between 2004 and 2007; it could employ hundreds of thousands more without a dime’s worth of wage or tax credits. All that is required is a more realistic energy policy: as Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute said recently, “We need no subsidy or stimulus, all we need is access.”

Yet “access” to proven deposits of oil and natural gas, which would encourage capital spending and generate jobs, is exactly what Washington intends to block by delaying an offshore leasing program that envisages 31 parcel sales off the Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf and Alaskan coasts over the next five years and by maintaining barriers to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Not long ago, it was predicted that drilling in Texas’s Barnett Shale would produce 70,000 jobs; it already has created 111,000 of them. Production in the Marcellus Shale area of Pennsylvania and New York State likewise has generated 29,000 jobs this year – and more than 50,000 jobs are expected to be added there next year. But policymakers are contemplating adding to the industry’s regulatory compliance costs by shifting control over recovering natural gas from shale deposits from the states to the federal government. Bureaucrats pursuing a green agenda are unlikely to respect recent job gains.

And on top of this are plans to impose a punitive tax on oil and gas companies, to raise the royalties they pay and to impose a carbon “cap-and-trade” system on the U.S. economy.

With one in ten Americans out of work, unemployment is at a 26-year high. Burdening energy companies and energy consumers with additional taxes and fees during a recession will not bring economic recovery.

Greater energy production would provide real stimulus to the U.S. economy, put hundreds of thousands of people to work and generate hundreds of millions of dollars in extra tax revenue. The Obama administration instead proposes to rely on artificial means by shifting monies borrowed from taxpayers to bail out financial institutions to sponsor the hiring of people who would not otherwise be offered jobs.

Far better to place confidence in the private sector, which can put Americans to work productively, supply the nation’s energy as well as its other needs and do so without worsening the federal deficit and then firing the people it has hired when the subsidy runs out.

William F. Shughart II is F.A.P. Barnard Distinguished Professor of Economics at The University of Mississippi and a senior fellow of The Independent Institute. Contact him at www.olemiss.edu/~shughart or at the Department of Economics, P. O. Box 1848, University, MS 38677-1848.
comments (4)
« thebeaver32 wrote on Saturday, Dec 19 at 05:43 PM »
I ses you two have drank the Koolaid offered by Algore and the rest of the "Man causes global warming" Nazis. I've looked into this theory EXTENSIVELY. No, I'm not a climatologist, but then, NEITHER IS AL GORE. All he did was write a book. But I AM a person of science. After all my research, I'm thoroughly convinced that the idea that man causes global warming is the biggest fraud that has been put over on the world population in just about all history.

The latest proof that served to cement this position was the recent release of hacked e-mails from that research center that all the wackos are using to "prove" global warming. These scientists are FRAUDS AND LIARS, and have no more integrity than your typical U.S. Congressman. They have manipulated the data to make it show what they WANT it to show. However, there are still a FEW honest scientists in the group, and they attempted to point out that the research was being manipulated.

The whole Gobal Warming cabal is now in a DESPERATE attempt to undo the damage that was caused to their claims. They are saying ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to deny that they have a political agenda they want to foist on the world. And they are attempting to enlist ANYONE who will back their position.

This whole issue is a massive attempt to grab power and control over all (and I mean ALL, EVERYONE in the WORLD) our lives. The way we live, the things we do. If you are falling for their lies anda trickery, then you are a fool.
report abuse
« MIKEOWEN wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 09:40 AM »


Just more Service Sector jobs and a pipe dream at that. These inflated numners include every person that could posssible be remotely connected with the oil and natural gas industry and are often counted in other job totals as well. For example the guy that delivers paper/sanitary supplies to the oil field is counted as a industry worker even though that portion of his job is only maybe ten percent of his entire job description.

At some point tangible production jobs have got to be created. No economy can last long based upon servicing itself.

Professor Shughart's suggestion would only serve to enrich fossil energy producers over the short term and provide a false sense of security to America during the same course.
report abuse
« eastcraig wrote on Monday, Dec 14 at 11:36 PM »
I'm all for developing new green energy, but not at the expense of proven, reliable, traditional energy. Let oil, gas, coal, nuclear expand and create jobs and prosperity - then give those industries tax incentives to develop commercially viable alternatives. TVA and Entergy have shown the economic development and affordable power we can get from nuclear. Wind and solar might add to that, but it won't replace it without bankrupting the country.
report abuse
« ABratt wrote on Sunday, Dec 13 at 10:36 AM »
Shugart is a typical CONSERVATIVE GLOBAL WARMING DENIER. Fighting fire with fire until the burning fossil fuels destroy our planet.

It's coming: the Fire, the Fire.

Pants on fire Shugerhart-- see him run--where will he hide? In the commode--maybe!

Al Bratton

Tupelo, Miss.
report abuse