EDITORIAL: Christ-like debate
by NEMS Daily Journal
10 months ago | 397 views | 7 7 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The main feature in today’s Faith & Religion section of the Daily Journal deals with the debate among Christians about our health care system and current efforts to reform it.

Whatever one’s perspective on government policy, there is no question that health care is a moral and religious issue. It strikes at the heart of the biblical mandate to attend to the physical as well as the spiritual needs of all.

Whether it’s the government’s role to ensure that health care is available to all is the question at the heart of the current debate. But if the answer is no, then Christians must ask themselves: What am I doing to help? How am I ensuring that “the least of these” in whom we meet Christ face to face are getting the health care they need?

The approach and details of policy are matters that people of faith can and do disagree on, but indifference to the plight of the sick and hurting is simply not an option for those who call themselves Christians.

In addition to a sincere effort to find the best ways to make high-quality, affordable health care available to those who need it, Christians have a responsibility to act Christ-like as the debate continues.

Jesus was never reluctant to call things as he saw them. He could be blunt, direct and challenging, especially to the religious authorities of the day.

But Jesus’ words were always spoken in love. And they were always spoken with empathy for those in need.

Too often the debate on health care turns unChrist-like. Arguments are made in anger. Opponents are regarded as enemies. Motives are questioned. Names are called.

All sides have engaged in exaggerations and distortions. There have been appeals to fear based on half-truths and less. Political posturing and self-interested gamesmanship have colored everything.

Jesus bids us to a higher calling, a way of working through a contentious issue that is not the way of the world. It uses love – the willed desire for the good of others – as its guide. It is respectful and truthful. It seeks not a victor and a vanquished but justice and reconciliation.

Often Christians, whatever their political stripe, have a hard time acting like Jesus. It’s difficult, and there aren’t many examples other than Christ himself to emulate. But that doesn’t make the mandate any less compelling.

The tenor and tone of our debate on health care and other critically important issues needs the leavening influence of Christ-like behavior. There need not be less passion or commitment, but there does need to be much more forbearance and good will.

Love – not the sentimental feeling, but the active response – is at the heart of it. The kind of love that avoids arrogance and condescension, that listens in order to understand if not agree, that values truth over advantage, and that genuinely seeks a solution for the benefit of all and not simply a victory for some.

It’s possible – unless Christians insist on taking their cue from the world.
comments (7)
« Bichon wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 08:12 PM »
It is ok to bloviate, its ok to try to be provocative, I rest my case with the intelligent folks and tax payers...just keep talking LOL
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 11:42 AM »
Hey all you people who had lots of kids when both of you had a good job and things were going well! Some people don't want you to get any help now that you don't have a job, because after all, if you couldn't feed em, you shouldn't have had 'em right? Even if you couldn't foresee 5 or 10 years ago losing your income. Tough luck. Oh and for all of you who had cancer or a medical condition that caused you to lose all your savings paying medical bills, and now you guys are not only out of work, but out of savings, your kids should probably just starve, because you ought to have KNOWN you were gonna get cancer and be bankrupt. Just shouldn't have had em.You're on your own, good night and good luck.
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 11:35 AM »
Wow you really are a pain in the behind Bichon aka msyankee. Enabling poor people? To do what? Eat a meal? Have a roof over their heads? That's enabling? Not to mention more of the poor I know have full time jobs and are still below the poverty line. There you go with the judging who's worthy of help and who's not. Judge not, lest ye be judged and in most cases, probably found lacking. At least you found out where the spell check was in your current incarnation.Oh and as an aside, for those of you that didn't know, slander and libel are against the law, so watch your steps and remember to use those ambiguous third person pronouns! God bless, have a nice day.
report abuse
« Bichon wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 05:52 PM »
It is creepy at best when those that want to be left to their own vices start lecturing Christians about what Jesus taught when they have no knowledge of Jesus or Christianity.

Christians do support helping the poor. We just do not believe in enabling the poor.

Poor people should be responsible if they need and want help. most of the poor produce large families.(increases their income)

IF YOU CAN'T FEED-EM DON'T HAV-EM

We should not demand tips we do not earn or enable tax cheats.
report abuse
« Woolhat wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 06:24 AM »
Exactly...He was an apocalyptic Jewish prophet. That much we know from the Scripture. As one expecting imminent apocalypse, He took no interest in money, or social organization. All the "what would Jesus do?" speculation is only that -- speculation. That's why people who claim to be making social or economic policy on His philosophy are building houses on the sand. Which ever side attempts to enlist Him in its cause is doing equal violence to the historical Man and His movement.

I find it interesting that the views one who was completely uninterested in government, as evidenced by being executed by imperial authority as a threat to the public order should become anybody's standard bearer for public policy debate.

report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Sunday, Oct 11 at 11:20 AM »
Gee, seems like so called Christians will do everything in their power to find an excuse not to be Christ like. They always find a reason why the poor shouldn't be helped. I'm sure they would've stoned Mary Magdalene to death. After all, God said it was OK. Oh sure, they help the poor, if the said "poor" person is a member of the church. If not, they'll find a million reasons why you aren't worthy of help. I'm not blaming all Christians for this phenomenon, but too often I see people hiding behind the Bible as an excuse to be uncaring,self righteous, hypocritical and just plain mean. Do you think Jesus really wants poor people to die earlier than the well to do...after all, they deserve it for having the gall to be unsuccessful, right? Might I remind you that Jesus himself required that his apostles leave behind all earthly possessions to wander as vagabonds. Money meant very little to him, and it really shouldn't mean so much to us.
report abuse
« Woolhat wrote on Saturday, Oct 10 at 01:09 PM »
We do love to cherry pick the Gospel when we enlist it in politics. The same admonition re: "the least of these," also addressed food, drink, alienation (strangers), incarceration, & nakedness.

Before we get too caught up in seeking Jesus' endorsement, we need to remember that He was apolitical at best, anti-government in the perception of Roman authority. "Render unto Caesar, indeed, but remember that "the kingdom of God is within you." Let's not bastardize the Gospel by getting it tangled up with politics.

Furthermore, Jesus Himself was selective about His ministry. See Luke 4:23-30.

Let's debate this thing on its merits in light of law, constitutional principles, human compassion, common sense, and economic feasibility. If it were possible to examine Jesus' wallet, I seriously doubt we'd find a membership card from any political party, or the AMA, for that matter.
report abuse