Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Proposals move forward for downtown Tupelo
by carlie.kollath
 Biz Buzz
2 years ago | 1577 views | 16 16 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
A conceptual image of what downtown Tupelo could look like if a traffic plan and beautification strategy are implemented
A conceptual image of what downtown Tupelo could look like if a traffic plan and beautification strategy are implemented
slideshow

The Downtown Tupelo Main Street Association is moving forward on a beautification plan for downtown that includes a reworked traffic flow, additional plant life, decorative street lights and amenities for pedestrians and cyclists. This is a rendering from RPM Transportation Consultants of what Main Street could look like if the proposed changes are implemented.

The preferred traffic plan includes a proposal to restripe Main Street from Green Street to Front Street to three lanes. The center lane will be a dedicated turn lane. Each side of the road also will have a bike lane and on-street parking.

Read more about the beautification plan in the Sunday Journal.

For a closer look at the proposals, go to our flickr stream to see the images.

 

 

Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
E=mc2
|
February 03, 2010
Intupelo- Sorry rambling is an uncontrollable affliction.I will try to make this simple...I think this city spends too much of my money on consultants for projects that come from someone(CDF)that must be doing something to justify their salary.I think this project won't serve ALL the citizens of Tupelo.With the limited funds we have I think they would be better spent elsewhere.Time to ramble...Yes there are more trucks on the Trace,ask law enforcement.No truckers aren't getting dumber,they are relying on GPS's and computer programs to get them to their destinations.The next time you travel the Trace look where the NO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES signs are..After the driver has committed his rig.I have my CDL's.And Yes the mayor should Hide like a hermit.Anything else would shed a negative light on this project.Sell the water tower for scrap metal,give it away.What exactly do you want to incorporate?The time is now and now's the time I got to Ramble on...Led Zeppelin.Sorry I could not...;)
carlie.kollath
|
January 18, 2010
A few of the comments posted under the related stories on NEMS360:

« jmtyes wrote on Sunday, Jan 17 at 11:35 PM »

I really have a problem with this mainly because why fix the street when u have nothing (no stores open) in the main part of town to go and shop. People try and buy building but the bank wont give anyone a chance. I dont feel like my town will prosper with adding all these street lights and nice pavement on the main street. That just glitz and people are not about to explore when the rest of your streets look like s**t.

« hkrjr@bellsouth.net wrote on Sunday, Jan 17 at 09:34 AM »

All this about making Main Street more user friendly is fine and dandy but much more attention needs to be focused on the Mall at Barnes Crossing area. This area has become a "confunction juction" of the worst kind. The area is in desperate need of some traffic flow restructuring. Even during non peak times, traffic flow is awful. I live in the area and I have to navigate through this mess everyday. Traffic every year is getting worse and there are more and more wrecks occurring. So, let the city leaders look more towards alleviating a more pressing problem than one that is not presently one.

« sandlot1959 wrote on Sunday, Jan 17 at 02:34 PM »

In my opinion, this type of plan can work in a Memphis or New Orleans where there are routes around the shopping area that don't cause congestion and incovenience. But Tupelo is neither of those cities and this plan will benefit downtown merchants (Reed's etc) at the expense of everyone else who travels through that area every single day. The idea sounds GREAT but its obvious that our downtown area is too contracted to handle this type of further contraction...I'm afraid its burden will only be realized by those in power, ONCE its already been done...THEN we will have an entirely new problem with few or no options to fix it...

carlie.kollath
|
January 18, 2010
Links to the two stories in Sunday's paper, along with more comments:

Downtown groups look to 'create a sense of place'

http://nems360.com/bookmark/5571644

Proposed street changes in Tupelo raise questions

http://nems360.com/bookmark/5582281
intupelo
|
January 17, 2010
@E=mc2

I see very few big trucks on the Trace, and travel it fairly often. Also, I would imagine that truckers know how to read road signs.

With the government agencies comment, I was referring to MDOT, MDA, etc. in regards to Highway 6. DTMSA and CDF seem to be the primary voices in the planning of the Main St. improvements, along with a consultant company. Theses agencies are strong proponents of economic development. They do not make decisions on a whim. They look at what will create a better place to live, as well as attract investment and/or business.

As far as the bike or walk paths go, creating an alternative to driving is not a bad thing, and cheaper than a public transit system. I was specifically referring to incorporating the rest of our city, not just downtown.

You make a good point of the ability of businesses to weather the disruption, but it can't be much worse than traffic running at 40-50 mph. The environment can be improved. I know businesses are what make a downtown thrive and we are lucky to have some strong businesses downtown - bank headquarters, law firms, architecture firms, retail establishments, restaurants, etc, many of which are members of CDF and DTMSA, who happen to be two of the groups that have played a role in this plan. I have had no role in any of this, other than that of a proud citizen and a commenter on this site. I have had the pleasure of living in other places with more business friendly downtowns and walk paths, and would love to see Tupelo develop more in that direction.

The water tower money is something I don't know much about. What benefit does it have? Isn't it listed as part of the Elvis tour? It does seem like a cause that maybe should have been funded by a preservation group. But what would the cost of taking it down be? If it is ignored, it could create a hazard. I don't know.

On the airport, I think there is more to the extension than has been said. The way the vote flew through the council when first brought up made me think there may be something big (economic development wise) tied to it.

On a separate note, could you attempt to make your statements more reader friendly? Your random thoughts, spacing and general ramblings are difficult to follow. I know I am no Albert Einstein, but I would think with a handle like "E=mc2", you would try to write a little more legibly ...recluse yourself?!? You want the mayor to hide in a hermit-like fashion?

E=mc2
|
January 17, 2010
Intupelo I wonder why there are somany big trucks on the Trace? Maybe it's those same GPS's that will keep sending big trucks the shortest route to highway 45N?Maybe a large amount of truck traffic would be eliminated as you suggest...How many 80,000Lb.trucks is o.k.in the garden of Eden?What "government agencies"don't cost me money?Where do you think the city would get the funds for bike paths city wide?I'm sure "government agencies"have study this(at no expense to me.)I'm not against progress.I'm against ideas that after implemented are realized short of what really should have been done.IE Bike paths when all the road construction was going on in Tupelo...Or did you not see that?To compare Downtown Tupelo to our state capitol is laughable.Where are these"ghost towns"?Towns with little population,and are not a regional hub city.Business is what makes a downtown area thrive..I'm sure you and the "government agencies"have looked into all the businesses "books"to make sure they could weather the disruption from such an undertaking?I'm sure Reeds could weather it.Is it really progress when you have to redo what you "thought" was a good idea just to find out other wise?Maybe your tax dollars would be better spent in a casino instead of the"crap shoot"this city seems to do.These are the same people that support spending 50,000 dollars on a water tower that supplies no water!A runway extension for an airport that can't keep an air carrier!Progress,YES.Whims,NO!
intupelo
|
January 17, 2010
In case those of you concerned with the "big truck traffic" haven't noticed, Highway 6 is currently under construction, thus eliminating a large amount of that traffic. This is part of MDOT's Vision 21 plan and will connect Highway 6 from the Pontotoc county line to Highway 45. I can assure you, the stop-and-go of Main Street is not something someone driving heavy freight wants to encounter. That being said, congestion on all of Main Street should be decreased after Highway 6 is completed. I don't think you could call any of this "on a whim" if you looked at the extensive planning between government agencies has taken place. Though if you haven't noticed construction of a major highway, I could see how it could appear as "on a whim".

I haven't noticed a change in traffic light timing since our newly elected mayor has taken office. I do agree that bike paths and sidewalks should be looked at city wide, not just downtown. A system of paths throughout the city would be nice, and could promote the healthy living plan.

I am glad to see that the folks downtown are making efforts to make our downtown a better, more inviting place. Too many city centers let themselves go, almost to the point of no return, before they make efforts to improve. Look at our state capitol, many buildings have been vacated so long it will take major funds to get back a strong city center. I personally am not a fan of ghost towns that appear in many Mississippi downtown areas, and am proud that ours is moving forward.



Whether you believe it or not, Tupelo is progressing.

concernedfortupelo
|
January 16, 2010
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. I would like to think that he also controls the traffic light at Main and Front. Ever wonder why everylight is green and that one stops you right in front of the store????? I also do not understand how all the bikes will get there. The rest of Main will still be congested..............Makes no sense unless the whole strip is done.
sandlot1959
|
January 16, 2010
emc your first sentence says alot...I'll leave it at that...
June Robertson
|
January 16, 2010
It sounds wonderful, I love Tupelo and hope that you also do some beautification around the area where the Elvis Presley Birthplace is, also.
E=mc2
|
January 16, 2010
I would like to think the Mayor would recluse himself from this project...BIG conflict of interest.What about big truck traffic?Main street is also a state highway.This traffic would need rerouted..as it should be anyhow.I read the links..I think this city spends on a "whim".I see it working for a few...Not the city as a whole."Downtown"doesn't need a"theme".Just how the heck are all these cyclist going to get downtown?I live in West Tupelo,somebody give me a safe route to downtown.The Mayor has his big health push going and I think this is part of that...not to mention all the folks that might stop in his store..If the Mayor thinks it is his job to make Tupelo"the healthiest city in the state"..great,I don't think It's my job to fund projects that support his agenda.HEALTH AND HOW I LIVE IS MY CHOICE.I wouldn't ask any of you to support any of my"bad habits".Why should I support,with my tax dollars ,something that smells like this project does?Spend the money on the cities youth.Not just the elite.
anonymous
|
January 15, 2010
Kimszrolltide
|
January 15, 2010
I really do like it... It will be beautiful.. I already enjoy downtown with all of the improvements made...but, this is just wonderful.
carlie.kollath
|
January 15, 2010
Good links, DHendricks! Thanks for posting them.

Also in Sunday's paper, we have a story about the ongoing project in downtown Gulfport and the group's advice for Tupelo.
BirdZ!
|
January 15, 2010
I really like the idea, but it will hurt traffic flow. The whole thing looks great, but I just don't think its practical.
DHendricks
|
January 15, 2010
Here's another article titled "Trees Mean Business: City Trees and the Retail Landscape" published by the same center that talks about the "downtown experience" and how walkability and trees are key to this experience. The Downtown Tupelo Main Street Association adopted the mission statement "Sustaining and Enhancing the Downtown Experience" just last year. This article explains it completely!

http://www.preservationnation.org/main-street/main-street-news/2009/august/members-only/trees-mean-business.html
DHendricks
|
January 15, 2010
This is so exciting!!! Read here for a great article titled "Walkability and Wealth Downtown" published by the National Main Street Center (A division of the National Trust for Historic Preservation) It basically explains how walkability of your district directly translates to dollars and cents for the community.

http://www.preservationnation.org/main-street/main-street-news/story-of-the-week/2009/walkability-and-wealth.html