Facebook Twitter eEdition Your News Business Directory List Business Classifieds Subscribe NEMisJobs NEMissPreps NEMSHomes NEMSDeals

Bulldogs Bowling for Answers
by bradlocke
 Inside Mississippi State Sports
2 years ago | 1286 views | 7 7 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

I'm still here in Bowling Green, Ky., pondering what transpired last night in Mississippi State's 55-52 loss to Western Kentucky. Coach Rick Stansbury tried to dismiss the notion that his team has any major issues to deal with as SEC play approaches – MSU opens at No. 14 Ole Miss on Saturday – and wanted to give a lot of credit to WKU. Fair enough.

But the final result is still a head scratcher. WKU coach Ken McDonald said after the game exactly what he said before the game – that he thinks MSU will vie for the SEC title. That's what most of us have thought, but that now seems like a shaky proposition.

As I listened to the Hilltoppers' postgame show on the way back to my hotel, one of the co-hosts said that something he always looks closely at are those five statistical categories you find in the small print at the bottom of the stat sheet. WKU won most of those categories.

• Points in the paint: MSU 20, WKU 20. That's an area where the Toppers have struggled, and MSU should have won that battle. So that's a win for Western.

• Points off turnovers: WKU 18, MSU 8. The Bulldogs committed 18 turnovers and were downright careless at times. But WKU also did a good job filling the passing and driving lanes.

• Second chance points: MSU 8, WKU 4. State won the rebounding battle, 41-34, which helped this stat.

• Fast break points: WKU 9, MSU 5. Transition basketball is what Stansbury prefers, but there wasn't much of it Monday night.

• Bench points: WKU 22, MSU 2. That's unacceptable. The bench is normally a strong point for MSU.

So I ask, how much concern should there be for MSU? Western Kentucky is a very good team; it's won three NCAA tournament games over the past two seasons. And this was a road game at a place that rarely sees the home team lose. But it seems like every time MSU faces a tough mid-major – see: Rider, Richmond – it struggles.

And those struggles raise the question of whether MSU really can compete for the SEC crown. I guess we'll start seeing the answer to that very soon.

Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Dawgz09
|
January 05, 2010
This may just be my opinion. The way I feel is that if we can't play full throttle, 110% effort, in your face basketball for EVERY MINUTE of EVERY GAME against EVERY TEAM, we need to get some players in there that will. I know Reik may have been as bad as everyone else last night but I can assure you he would have had his heart in it. Also, I know Varnado is good and all but he has to get tired at some point. That Dixon kid they had made a fool out of him on several occasions and I know Jarvis is a better player. I would have put in Riek for at least a couple minutes and let Jarvis get fresh legs. He couldn't have blocked a Western Kentucky cheerleader last night with those tired legs.
tupelojoe81
|
January 05, 2010
BL, you told me to remind you to post the SEC schedule with times and TV info, so here is the reminder for Saturday! You da man.
Dawgaholics-United
|
January 05, 2010
True, but I think they've developed a pretty good sense of the rivalry just from their experience last year. They know how important it is to beat TSUN.

I think we'll see the intensity that we've been missing on Satuday.
tupelojoe81
|
January 05, 2010
Dawgaholics, you would think that seeing the Ole Miss script would fire them up, BUT, remember, half, if not most of our team isnt even from Mississippi. 11 out of 18 listed arent from MS, and I would say 12, since Sidney spent his time in LA. They dont understand the rivalry as much as they should, I bet.
Dawgaholics-United
|
January 05, 2010
One thing I would like to see us do in the future is strengthen our non-conference schedule. I know that sounds ridiculous after losing to Rider, Richmond, and WKU, but bare with me.

When we play big name teams, we tend to play with more intensity. Even if we lose, it strengthens our pathetic SOS which drives the RPI up. We currently have the 184th toughest schedule in the country. That's embarrassing.

I would much rather lose to UNC than WKU. It would help recruiting, too. Just my opinion.
Dawgaholics-United
|
January 05, 2010
We seem to do this nearly every year. We start off sluggish and then finish strong. I have no reason to believe this year will be any different. I think motivation has been lacking in some games. Seeing that script Ole Miss on those jerseys on Saturday should be enough to motivate them. That should be enough to hit many of those shots we missed last night. We just have to take care of the basketball and make our free throws.

Phil Turner was 95% on FT's going into the game last night. I believe he was 2 of 4? If our 95% FT shooter hits those 2 he missed, we win the game. I don't know what was wrong with Phil.

I think once the SEC season gets warmed up and we get 10,000 fans at the Hump and a little more sense of urgency on the road, we'll be fine. You live by the 3, and you die by the 3. We were atrocious shooting the 3 and still nearly won this game.
ezfreeze
|
January 05, 2010
At this point, I don't think they can compete for an SEC crown... I believe that is definitely out of the question... Kentucky is playing like an NBA team...

MSU is playing like they don't care until it is almost too late...

I think one of the biggest factors is there isn't any vocal leaders on the team... Barry Stewart and Jarvis Varnado are considered the 2 leaders of the team... But they are soft spoken guys... And soft spoken guys don't motivate...

Seems like the talent is there... But motivation seems like the biggest concern... If Phil was a starter, I think it would help more...

And at this point... Kodi should be replaced by Phil...